Sunday, 27 January 2008

The myth of the Good Christian Man

What does it take to be regarded as a good Christian?

Everyone, I would guess, has their own ideas on the finer details of exactly what makes a person a good Christian, but it does seem that in many churches there is agreement on the broad strokes of what such a creature would look like.

Erin has written a few posts recently (see here and here for starters) about the expectations which are often placed on women in the church. In many church communities they’re expected to be submissive, subservient, modestly-dressed, Stepford wives, to a greater or lesser extent. I’m not going to go into detail here - I’ll leave the analysis to Erin, who as a woman is more qualified to comment than I am.

I’m going to comment instead on something on which I am qualified to address, namely the way in which the expectations that are placed on men in the church can be just as oppressive, albeit in different ways.

First, what are the expectations the church has of its men? I’m sure most churched men will recognise some of the following. A "Good Christian Man" is expected:

• To be married
• To be meek and mild-mannered
• To be submitted to those in leadership
• To avoid controversy
• To dress in the accepted manner

Let’s have a look at some of the items from the above list individually, shall we?

1. A Christian man is expected to be married.

Don’t believe me on this? Well, from my own experience I can tell you that I only seemed to exist for some people in the church once I was married. Before then, despite being in my early thirties, I was still treated like a boy by a significant number of people within the church. Then after I was married, suddenly I was treated as a mature man, as “Brother Barry”. Yet I was still exactly the same person the day after I got married as I was the day before I got married. I’ve seen the same thing happen to other Christian men of my acquaintance too. Those who are married tend to be treated with more respect than those of similar age who are single.

How would Jesus have fared in these conditions? He was probably unmarried, after all. Would he have been treated like a boy too?

2. A Christian man is expected to be meek and mild-mannered.

One of the greatest disservices the church has ever done to men was to create the fiction of “gentle Jesus, meek and mild”. He was anything but. He was uncompromising, worked hard, lived hard, got angry and even on one occasion attacked people with a whip in the Temple courts. That doesn't sound very meek and mild to me.

Why has the church effectively emasculated its men? Why are we constantly held up to an ideal that is somewhat effeminate and unmasculine? Is it any wonder that there are more women in the church than men? There is a reason that the wider public perception of Christian men, at least in this country, is that they are slightly effeminate, somewhat geeky, spineless wimps.

John Eldredge has come into some criticism over his use of scripture, but one thing he got right in his book Wild at Heart is that men need to be allowed to be men and not pressured to behave like women with testicles. We are not, of course, better than women, but we are different. That difference between the sexes should be recognised and respected.

Forgive my profanity, but I say "Bollocks!" to meek and mild-mannered. Let me be who I really am instead. If there are edges to my personality that need to be rounded, let God do it his way instead of trying to effeminise me.

Of course we should try to be like Jesus - but we should be like the real Jesus, not the romanticised, effeminate goody-two-shoes the Victorians created.

3. A Christian man is expected to be submitted to leaders and to avoid controversy.

Being submitted to leaders is fine as long as it's a healthy relationship. However, it should not mean unquestioning obedience to a controlling leader.

Sometimes, like it or not, controversy is unavoidable if one is willing to stand up for what is right. Without going into details, my own experience of church would have been much easier if I had let a certain controlling person have his way, but there came a point where I had to stand up and say enough was enough and it caused big waves in the church. I could easily have stayed submissive and let him have his way, but the price of that course of action would probably have been either my spiritual or mental health.

There's nothing wrong with voluntary submission to good, accountable leaders, but no Christian man should ever conform to expectations that he should be a doormat.

4. A Christian man should dress in the accepted manner.

In my own church experience, the accepted form of dress for a man was a suit and tie. Casual shirt and tie were acceptable, but to be really spiritual, brother, you needed to wear a suit. After all, you'd wear your best clothes if you were invited to Buckingham Palace to see the Queen, so you should do the same when you come into the presence of God.

Somehow the fact that we are in the presence of God every moment of every day seemed to be disregarded by the people who thought like this. (So was the fact that I'm a republican and have no respect for the British royalty.)

Whatever happened to "Man looks on the outward appearance, but God sees the heart"? I very much doubt that God is bothered by what I wear to church, as he sees me all the time whatever I'm wearing. Surely he's more concerned by the state of my heart than he is by what's on my back.

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*

The thing is, we are all individuals. As soon as the church or any other group takes the “one size fits all” approach to its members, there will always be those for whom that “one size” doesn’t fit, who will be made to feel very uncomfortable as they try hard to make themselves fit into its restrictive dimensions. “One size fits all” just doesn’t work. Those who don't fit in will in many cases end up either repressing their true selves or abandoning the whole system altogether.

My final thought on all this is simple. We should encourage people to be who they really are in God, not try to force them into conformity. The "Good Christian Man" is a myth, so let's not try to force believing men to become caricatures.

26 comments:

Rob said...

Amen, Brother Barry! :) (And I say that as a pastor . . . you think your dress code is stiff . . .)

Erin said...

Fantastic Barry! I'm so glad you addressed this perspective.

I think you hit it out of the park with the last two paragraphs. That is exactly what almost drove me to a nervous breakdown. The repressing myself. Wow.

Thanks!

Nate said...

I think that I have finally gotten to the point in my life where I have been out of church, as much as in it.

Dont' drink, don't smoke, don't swear, don't laugh at dirty jokes, don't approve of any homosexual, etc... etc...

Uh Oh, I do all of those. Everything but the drinking, every day. Drinking only once or twice a week.

I wear jeans, Tshirts and tennis shoes to church. Yes as the pastor's son, I got "the look" at doing that.

It was fun rattling the old farts' cages. I think I still enjoy it.

Nate said...

Oh yeh, forgot the gambling. Lotto, and Black Jack at the tables when I end up in Las Vegas for work and such. (I don't like Vegas very much. So don't go by choice.)

Nate said...

Also if you hit the full size photo on my profile, you will see the Becks bear tshirt I am wearing.

Nate said...

I spelled beer wrong.

Barry said...

Rob: The dress code may have been stiff, but just like Nate I consciously ignored it for my last few years in the church. I did have a few years of conformity, but I gave up on that because it just left me feelign uncomfortable and somehow like I was prostituting myself.

Barry said...

Erin: I don't think I got as far down the line towards nervous breakdown as you did, but I certainly was very conscious of my self-repression. I felt like I was living a lie, and the stress of that would eat me up every time I set foot inside the church. I'm sure my leaving the church just reinforced to some people the idea that I must have been a hopeless case. After all, I had opinions...

Barry said...

Nate: are you going for the record of most comments left on an Honest Faith post? ;o)

Apart from smoking and visiting Las Vegas, you're telling my story there as well as yours.

Oh, and as regards rattling the old farts' cages, I have for a long time now had a Darwin Fish on the back of my car. You can imagine the responses that has got :o)

Calia77 said...

Found you through Erin's post. I must say (I'm a little naive at times) that I didn't realise guys had the same pressures put on them to be 'proper Christians' as we women do. I'm thankful that I'm currently in a church where that stuff doesn't matter so much.

Great thoughts. Thank you for sharing them.

Barry said...

Nate: there are other reasons why I'm going to Heck as well. I dance regularly with women to whom I am not married (and I'm about to compete in several dance competitions with one of them). I go to the cinema, I drink alcohol, I go to pubs and I have even been known to go to the theatre and take children with me, thus corrupting young minds! Eek! Heck, here I come!

Calia77: thanks for your comment. I think pressure to conform is a problem that is common to both sexes.

Steve S said...

While the Vineyard movement has its faults too, this was one of the areas where it very consciously changed things (that’s what you get when your founder was a heathen, rock-and-roll musician before God called him). I went to the big pastor’s conference last year (as a lay minister) and a no one wore suits (about a third of the guys wore Hawaiian shirts and jeans) and they played secular rock and roll music at the picnic. No one ever accused Wimber of encouraging men to be meek or avoid controversy – more often he was accused of not keeping things under control. With regard to singleness, I have long since passed the point where I personally experience that; but we have several single people in ministry in our church and I have never seen them treated any different.

Barry said...

Steve: I'm glad to hear that the Perfect Christian Man/Woman Syndrome isn't universal to all churches. I'm also glad to hear that single people are included. As you know, that was a big issue for me before I got married.

Barbara said...

Found you via Erin :) Great post. One thing I noticed is that the dress code sure is different than here in CA. My pastor usually wore jeans and a polo shirt - and that was dressy compared to the rest of the church.

I have to say that I naively had my own version of the myth of a Christian man. For the first 12 years as a Christian I chose not to date. Once I started dating I actually believed in that Christian men would not try to get me in bed because, after all, it was "sin". Man was I wrong. The single Christian men I have met seem no different than any other men I know except they don't cuss in public and they go to church.

Erin said...

After thinking about it, I realized you forgot one...

The "Spiritual Leader"...or "Spiritual Head of Household". My Husband has complained about that one a lot.

I'm glad you brought this up...because so often we are caught in our own paradigm (in this case, being women) and forget that others might be faced with the same issue.

Steve S said...

Barbara - A fellow Californian!
We're down in Mountain View (not _too_ far from you).

Barry said...

Barbara: it's like I said, one size doesn't fit all. We may be believers, but at the end of the day we're still men and we're just as weak and strong, holy and profane, laid back and aggressive as non-Christian men.

Barry said...

Erin: you're right, I forgot that one. It's a biggie too! I often joke that I'm the head of my household because my wife tells me I am.

Personally I believe in equality within marriage, but with different roles. I don't think those roles have to be the traditional ones either. Everything is open to negotiation and discussion. If my wife thinks one thing and I think another, I have no right to insist on my way because I'm the man and the head of the household. She is in every way my equal.

Of course, what really makes me laugh is the large numbers of Christian marriages where it is insited that the man is the head of the household, but it's obvious to even casual observers that he's firmly under the thumb!

Sue said...

Preach it, Brothah Barry. Preach it :)

And do it in your shorts and a ripped t-shirt with jam stains down the front.

Barbara said...

Barry, yes, I figured that out - lol, and actually I was quite relieved :)

Erin said...

Wait - you dance with women you're not married to? I don't think I can be your friend anymore.

;-)

By the way, what the heck is modern jive dancing?

Barry said...

Didn't I always warn you that I'm a sinner on my way to Heck? ;o)

See my new post HERE to find out what Modern Jive is.

Barry said...

Sue: I think my preaching days are probably over!

Sue said...

Barry - well, I always thought that you don't need a pulpit to preach but just be walking around with skin on. Seems the best kinds of sermons I hear these days are the ones where people are walking them out :)

Erin said...

Sue - Would you care to qualify that "skin on" thing just a bit? I just had a horrifying vision of one of my ex-pastors preaching in *just* his skin.

Hehe.

Sue said...

Hehe Erin. Yeah, I get some pretty crappy visuals from here too. No, I've already suggested Barry wear jam-stained t-shirts to do his non-intellectualising-non-pulpiteering-just-out-of-his-life preaching :)vai